828cloud

Data, Info and News of Life and Economy

Daily Archives: March 9, 2023

Chart: U.S. Fed Cumulative Losses Since September 2022

Source : Wolf Street

Chart: Market Expected Higher Terminal Fed Rate in 2023

Source : Bloomberg

Music Video: Brandy (You’re a Fine Girl)

Infographic: The Most (and Least) Expensive Cities to Live In

See large image . . . . . .

Source : Visual Capitalist

Are We Headed For A Recession Or Not?

Santul Nerkar and Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux wrote . . . . . . . . .

Inflation isn’t under control, and we’re heading for a recession. Except, wait: The latest jobs report indicates that the labor market is healthier than it’s been in years. So maybe we’re heading for the fabled “soft landing” as the Federal Reserve tries to curb inflation. Except, wait: That jobs report was too good, which means that the Fed will hike rates even higher — and economic pain is coming.

You’re confused. We’re confused. Who isn’t confused? Economic signals are pointing in different directions, and with every new data release comes a new batch of headlines declaring that our odds of heading into a recession are higher or lower than they were before.

The reality is that everyone is guessing. Let’s not forget that economists are bad at predicting recessions, and the economy is particularly weird right now. Inflation, for example, hadn’t been a serious issue for nearly four decades — but now it’s framing the way everyone is thinking and talking about the economy. Even though it probably won’t make anyone more certain about what happens next, it’s worth trying to understand what the indicators are saying when they’re taken together.

It’s not a clear story, and there are very different ways to present the data. Here are two possibilities for the next few months, and the evidence that does — or doesn’t — support each scenario.

A strong labor market — and slowing inflation — means we’re heading for a soft landing

This is the most optimistic outlook for the economy in the near term, as it suggests that the Fed will continue to bring down inflation without having to accelerate rate increases and cause too much harm to the economy — particularly as it relates to the labor market — perhaps even avoiding a recession altogether. Put differently, this scenario suggests that we can have our cake and eat it, too, as far as it comes to achieving both price stability and maximum employment.

And it’s not the view of just the sunshine-pumpers to suggest that we’re heading for a soft landing, nor is that outlook, as former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers put it, “at odds with both economic theory and evidence.” The latest data released, for January 2023, shows that inflation has cooled to a year-over-year rate of 6.3 percent1 since its July 2022 peak of 8.9 percent, and yet the unemployment rate has stayed stubbornly low at 3.4 percent, the lowest figure in more than a half-century.

Typically, when the Fed raises interest rates to counteract inflation (or fears of it), it comes with a tradeoff: a pretty crappy economy. In the 1980s, the central bank took a markedly aggressive approach to combating inflation, raising rates to a sky-high 19 percent to bring inflation down from a mark of nearly 15 percent. This move caused a deep — but arguably necessary — recession, and it’s an episode that has informed the thinking of not just economists and Fed officials in the decades since, but ordinary Americans as well.

But one reason history might not repeat itself is a fundamental difference in the current labor market. You may recall that, prior to the pandemic, the U.S. economy was flourishing. A lot of that had to do with the relative strength of the labor market, as broad-based growth in sectors ranging from health care to construction led to a historically low unemployment rate and improving labor-force participation rate, signaling a boom. And now, it appears that we have recaptured that economy in many ways — replete with a very low unemployment rate and many, many job openings. That’s unlike when the Fed started its ultra-aggressive approach in the late 1970s, when inflation and unemployment were significantly higher, and when the economy had been struggling through a crisis of “stagflation.”

“The labor market is so tight that it’s hard to see how we can experience something like back in the ’80s,” said Fernando Martin, assistant vice president in the research division at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. “You’re not going to see big increases in GDP growth or anything like that. But unless we start seeing indicators that the labor market starts deteriorating, it’s hard to start predicting a recession in the traditional sense.”

Finally, if you hold that the recent inflation we saw was largely the byproduct of gummed-up supply chains, then there’s even further reason for optimism. Signs point to supply chains having improved since the height of the pandemic, which has potentially contributed to easing inflation and suggests that the Fed can continue bringing prices down without resorting to 1980s-style monetary engineering.

“The Fed is trying to reduce aggregate demand, but with supply chains repairing at the same time, they don’t need to reduce aggregate demand so sharply that we actually get rising unemployment,” said Carola Binder, a professor of economics at Haverford College. “So I think it does seem possible to have a soft landing — and seems fairly likely, even.”

Inflation isn’t under control, and the labor market is too tight — so we’re probably heading for a hard landing
Let’s not get too happy yet, though. Several economists we spoke with cautioned that not all of the indicators are as good as they look at first glance, and a recession could still be coming.

The logic behind this is fairly simple: Although inflation seems to be ebbing, it’s not slowing as quickly as the Fed wants. And that really strong labor market could be too strong for the Fed’s liking, since if workers — not jobs — are in demand, employers will be under pressure to raise wages. This could then lead to higher costs for consumers as companies try to compensate, while people also have more money to spend. To make sure that doesn’t happen, the Fed seems almost certain to continue on its rate-hiking journey, which could end up slowing down the economy too much.

“Inflation has a long way to go by any measure, and I don’t see how you can get inflation down with wage growth the way it is,” said Jonathan Wright, an economics professor at Johns Hopkins University. “And given a fairly tight time horizon, I think the Fed will err on the side of doing too much.”

The argument that economists like Wright are making is that yes, it’s possible for a soft landing to happen — but conditions have to stay pretty much ideal for that to become reality. And Wright said that there’s a lot of room for things to go sideways. There might not be a lot of competition for jobs, for one thing, but the share of people either working or actively looking for a job (62.4 percent in January 2023) is still lower than it was before the pandemic (63.3 percent in February 2020). “What you’d like to see is everyone back in the labor force, but for older workers, it looks like labor-force participation may be permanently lower,” he said. To him, this means that the current trajectory of the labor market is unsustainable — and preventing high wage growth (which could drive inflation higher) will require stronger intervention from the Fed than we’ve already seen.

Another sign that the Fed may soon come in harder, Wright said, is that financial markets aren’t behaving as if the Fed has been consistently hiking rates for almost a year. For example, mortgage rates fell for several weeks in January after rising for most of 2022. They’ve spiked again in the past couple of weeks, but it was a troubling signal for Wright, who said that generally speaking, financial conditions have been “much easier” than they should be given the Fed’s actions — and that could undercut the Fed’s work, prompting them to push for even more aggressive rate hikes in the future.

Recessions can also be hard to see while they’re happening — there’s a reason why the official determination of recessions, made by the National Bureau of Economic Research, is backward-looking. And there are a few clues that the economy could already be weakening. For instance, the industrial production index declined in both November and December and was flat in January, sparking speculation that we’re already in a “manufacturing recession.” Business sales also somewhat faltered in the fall, which could be another reason for pessimism.

Ryan Sweet, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, said that he thinks a soft landing is possible — it just isn’t likely, given how many things have to go right to keep the economy on track. “We could skirt [a recession], but it will take luck,” he said. That doesn’t mean, though, that we’re heading for a deep or prolonged economic decline, like the Great Recession. If a recession does happen, Sweet thinks it would be because the Fed made a “policy error” in hiking rates too aggressively. “Historically, those are mild recessions,” Sweet said. “If the unemployment rate goes up by a percentage point, that means the economy is softening and it will be uncomfortable. But the NBER might not even date it as a recession.”

Of course, if the COVID-19 economy has taught us anything, it’s that we shouldn’t be completely comfortable about using these indicators to make predictions. It isn’t just a feature of the pandemic, either, as economists are notorious for incorrectly predicting when the next recession will come about. That uncertainty has washed over onto our understanding of the economy during the pandemic, as we’ve transitioned from boom, to bust, to potentially too much boom over the past 36 months.

Another potential danger lies in assuming that all recessions look the same and that our not-so-trusty indicators can tell the full story, even when it appears they’ve accurately predicted our fate. Martin referred to how one key indicator of recessions that experts look to, an inverted yield curve, “predicted” the COVID-19 recession — but months before anyone knew of the virus’s devastating capacity.

“If you look at the data, well, a recession happened,” Martin said. “But you know, [the inverted yield curve] had nothing to do with anything. That was a completely unexpected shock and a cautionary tale of indicators and predictive power.”

Maybe the lesson is that we’re flying blind, or that our navigation of the economy can only be so precise. No matter the outcome, though, we’ll know in the coming months and years whether our economic engines have made a hard — or soft — landing on the proverbial tarmac.


Source : FiveThirtyEight

Chart: The Generational Divide on ‘Quiet Quitting’

Source : Statista

中國证监会调整为国务院直属机构,职责也有新变化,意味着什么

田忠方 wrote . . . . . . . . .

据新华社,根据国务院关于提请审议国务院机构改革方案的议案,中国证券监督管理委员会(下称“证监会”)调整为国务院直属机构。证监会由国务院直属事业单位调整为国务院直属机构。强化资本市场监管职责,划入国家发展和改革委员会的企业债券发行审核职责,由证监会统一负责公司(企业)债券发行审核工作。

“证监会由国务院直属事业单位调整为国务院直属机构,意义是很大的。” 中国资本市场研究院院长吴晓求在接受澎湃新闻记者采访时表示,调整之后,证监会的机构性质出现了变化,行使政府监管的职能,地位也有所提高。

国际投行高盛的全球投资研究部宏观经济研究团队也给出积极评价,认为国务院机构改革方案体现了中国政策决策层未来几年的工作重点,保留中国证监会并将其调整为国务院直属机构显示,中国领导层关注股票市场的发展,希望扩大直接融资,优化资本配置并减缓债务累积。

强化证监会行政执法效能

“提级保障证券监管行政执法效能。”清华大学五道口金融学院副院长、金融学讲席教授田轩向澎湃新闻表示,此次机构改革方案中,证监会由国务院直属事业单位调整为国务院直属机构,体现了党和国家对于资本市场高质量发展的高度重视。与之前的证监会作为国务院直属事业单位相比,直属机关具有独立的行政主体资格,可以在主管事项范围内,对外发布命令和指示。这样的调整安排,对于证监会今后强化行政执法能力,在机构地位上予以了保障。

在田轩看来,全面注册制改革背景下,我国资本市场监管回归以信息披露为核心的监管理念,这就客观上需要监管部门强化法制化监管的水平。成为国务院直属机构,有助于证监会更好地统筹金融监管工作,推动证券监管更快速地提质增效。

“最新提请审议的国务院机构改革方案的议案,特别是证监会调整为国务院直属机构,并进行的相关职责调整,主要释放了三层市场信号和意义。”武汉科技大学金融证券研究所所长董登新对澎湃新闻记者说,一是进一步凸显资本市场的地位和作用,提升资本市场监管的专业化水平和能力。二是强化对金融消费者和投资者的权益保护。三是释放了加大金融风险的防范力度的信号,本次机构改革方案,对于金融风险更加强调了监管合作,具有非常重要的意义。

中国市场学会金融委员、允泰资本创始合伙人付立春向澎湃新闻记者表示,“证监会调整为国务院直属机构并进行的相关职责调整,总的来说,是把资本市场和其监管工作,放到了更重要的位置,释放了高层对资本市场的重视态度,表明了资本市场重要性的进一步提升。”

公开资料显示,证监会诞生于1992年,当年10月,国务院证券委员会(国务院证券委)和中国证券监督管理委员会(证监会)宣告成立。其中,国务院证券委是国家对证券市场进行统一监督管理的主管机构。证监会是国务院证券委的监管执行机构,依照法律法规对证券市场进行监管。

1993年11月,国务院决定将期货市场的试点工作交由国务院证券委负责,证监会具体执行。

1995年3月,国务院正式批准《中国证券监督管理委员会机构编制方案》,确定证监会为国务院直属副部级事业单位,是国务院证券委的监管执行机构,依照法律、法规的规定,对证券期货市场进行监管。

1997年8月,国务院研究决定,将上海、深圳证券交易所统一划归证监会监管,并在上海和深圳两市设立证监会证券监管专员办公室。

1997年11月,中央召开全国金融工作会议,决定对全国证券管理体制进行改革,理顺证券监管体制,对地方证券监管部门实行垂直领导,并将原由中国人民银行监管的证券经营机构划归证监会统一监管。

1998年4月,根据国务院机构改革方案,决定将国务院证券委与证监会合并组成国务院直属正部级事业单位。同年9月,国务院批准了《中国证券监督管理委员会职能配置、内设机构和人员编制规定》,明确证监会为国务院直属事业单位,是全国证券期货市场的主管部门。

据证监会官网3月8日资料显示,证监会为国务院直属正部级事业单位,依照法律、法规和国务院授权,统一监督管理全国证券期货市场,维护证券期货市场秩序,保障其合法运行。

在最新的国务院机构改革方案中,证监会将由国务院直属事业单位调整为国务院直属机构。

提高融资效率,强化股票与债券协调发展

根据方案,国家发展和改革委员会的企业债券发行审核职责划入证监会,由证监会统一负责公司(企业)债券发行审核工作。

据悉,此前,企业类债券发行审批由三部门分别负责,银行间交易商协会负责监管短融、中票等,证监会负责公司债,发改委负责企业债。

对于企业债券发行审核职责划入证监会,吴晓求认为,证券化的金融资产,其发行、交易、监管,都应该由证监会来统一监管。

“调整之前,公司发行不同类别的债券,需要到不同的部门。发行审批主体的分离,也使得债券市场出现了分割,同时会影响债券作为重要资产的流动性。”吴晓求说,“调整之后对中国债券市场的一体化,应该说具有非常重要的作用。”

田轩对此的解读是,未来企业债和公司债将在规则层面进一步趋同,有望告别以往企业债和公司债市场多头监管的局面,杜绝利用审核标准不统一进行监管套利的行为,为债券市场健康稳定发展提供保障。

付立春表示,在公司进行直接融资中,相关调整应该说进一步加强了债券和股票的协调发挥,有利于资本市场融资功能运行得更加高效,提升了公司综合融资效率。

“同时,该项调整对于债券市场的监管效率,也是大有裨益的。”付立春进一步指出。

中金公司研报认为,发改委的企业债发行审核职责划入证监会,由证监会统一负责公司债、企业债发行审核工作,此次调整后债券发行监管有望进一步统一。

对于债市监管权责的调整,有券商人士对澎湃新闻记者坦言:“公司债的权责划分,不同监管部门间的沟通协调问题,其实是一直存在的,市场对此也是一直都有相关的呼吁。”

近年来,债券市场在推动提高直接融资比重、服务实体经济等方面发挥了重要作用,我国债市改革工作也不断得到高层关心。

2020年4月,《中共中央 国务院关于构建更加完善的要素市场化配置体制机制的意见》公布。《意见》明确要求加快发展债券市场。稳步扩大债券市场规模,丰富债券市场品种,推进债券市场互联互通。统一公司信用类债券信息披露标准,完善债券违约处置机制。探索对公司信用类债券实行发行注册管理制。加强债券市场评级机构统一准入管理,规范信用评级行业发展。

2021年3月5日,国务院总理李克强在政府工作报告中提出,加强债券市场建设,更好发挥多层次资本市场作用,拓展市场主体融资渠道。

2021年8月,中国人民银行、发展改革委、财政部、银保监会、证监会和外汇局联合发布《关于推动公司信用类债券市场改革开放高质量发展的指导意见》,成为信用债市场发展的纲领性文件。指导意见按照分类趋同的原则,逐步统一公司信用类债券发行交易、信息披露、信用评级、投资者适当性、风险管理、对外开放等各类制度和执行标准,全面推动我国信用债市场改革落实到细处。

2022年4月,《中共中央 国务院关于加快建设全国统一大市场的意见》公布,并提出“推动债券市场基础设施互联互通,实现债券市场要素自由流动”。

数据显示,截至2023年2月底,我国信用债市场存量规模约58.6万亿元,其中公司信用类债券占比超过40%,主要包括短融、中票等银行间债券市场非金融企业债务融资工具13.6万亿元,交易所市场公司债10.3万亿元,以及企业债2.1万亿元。

加强投资者权益保护

根据方案,组建国家金融监督管理总局,作为国务院直属机构,统一负责除证券业之外的金融业监管。证监会的投资者保护职责划入国家金融监督管理总局。

吴晓求表示,证监会的投资者保护职责划入国家金融监督管理总局,符合金融消费者权益保护的需求。同时,在日常运行中,证监会独立、完整地行使证券市场监管职能,将投资者保护职责划入国家金融监督管理总局,从逻辑上来讲也是成立的。

在证监会的原有组织机构中,内部职能部门中,设有投资者保护局。

证监会官网3月8日资料显示,目前投资者保护局的机构职能,为负责投资者保护工作的统筹规划、组织指导、监督检查、考核评估;推动建立健全投资者保护相关法规政策体系;统筹协调各方力量,推动完善投资者保护的体制机制建设;督导促进派出机构、交易所、协会以及市场各经营主体在风险揭示、教育服务、咨询建议、投诉举报等方面,提高服务投资者的水平;推动投资者受侵害权益的依法救济;组织和参与监管机构间投资者保护的国内国际交流与合作。

中金公司研报表示,监管机构改革是2017年成立“金稳委”、2018年合并银保监会以来幅度最大的金融监管机构调整,将“一行两会”调整为“一行一局一会”的新格局,总体而言延续了从2017年以来从“分业监管”向“综合监管”的发展趋势,除了有利于提高管理效率、减少监管套利、降低金融风险等,进一步保护了金融消费者和投资者权益。


Source : The Paper