Data, Info and News of Life and Economy

Daily Archives: April 7, 2022

Music Video: Dizzy

In Pictures: Russia Under Sanctions

The U.S. and EU are hammering Russia with a fresh round of sanctions, after revelations of the killing of civilians in Bucha, Ukraine.

The sum of economic penalties on Moscow has put a heavy toll on the country’s economy, as European countries curb Russian fuel purchases and international brands withdrew. More than 600 companies have announced a suspension of operations in Russia since the beginning of the war, according to a Yale School of Management report

Source : Caixin

Hong Kong Economic Slump Deepens as China Outbreak Hits Output

Krystal Chia wrote . . . . . . . . .

Hong Kong’s private-sector economic activity slid further into contraction in March as lockdowns in mainland China added more pressure to businesses already under strain.

The S&P Global purchasing managers’ index fell to 42 in March from 42.9 in February, as the gauge continued to fall to levels not seen since April 2020. It was also the third consecutive month that the index was below 50, the level separating expansion from contraction.

New orders and output declined at a faster rate in March. Orders from the mainland “were affected by the Covid-19 lockdowns in the region,” S&P Global said in a statement.

Hong Kong has been fighting a prolonged virus outbreak for months, leading authorities to implement strict measures to control infections. Lockdowns in mainland China, meanwhile, are aggravating lead times and price pressures, according to the S&P Global statement.

“Hong Kong’s private sector can be seen shrinking at a faster rate in March, faced with all the negative consequences of the latest Covid-19 wave and the corresponding movement restrictions,” said S&P Global economics associate director Jingyi Pan. “Supply constraints, made worse by lockdowns in Mainland China, and price pressures, aggravated by the Ukraine war, further weighed on Hong Kong private sector firms.”

Still, employment levels rose in March. S&P Global said its survey respondents “ramped up their hiring activity after the fall in workforce capacity in February.”

Pan expects Hong Kong’s gross domestic product to contract in the first quarter.

The city is set to lift some measures from April 21, including allowing restaurants to reopen dinner service and let as many as four people dine together. The government will also start to distribute consumption vouchers this month in hopes of boosting the economy.

Source : BNN Bloomberg

“The West Will Decide on Putin’s Bankruptcy”

Peter Littger wrote . . . . . . . . .

As a teenager, Jim O’Neill, 65, wanted to play professional soccer for Manchester United. But his father, a mailman, encouraged him to study economics. He earned his Ph.D. at the University of Surrey, with his thesis focusing on the trade policy of oil exporters. Since then, he has focused on economic models and their effects on the real world of currencies and goods. Between 1995 and 2013, O’Neill was a partner at Goldman Sachs, serving as the investment bank’s chief economist for some of that time. His primary focus was on the development of the global economy, particularly the future of emerging markets like China and Russia.

From 2014 to 2016, O’Neill worked for the British government, developing strategies to combat rising drug resistance and to boost economic development in the North of England. O’Neill is a member of the House of Lords (as Baron O’Neill of Gatley) and works with think tanks like Chatham House and Bruegel in Brussels. Since 2014, he has been an honorary professor of economics at the University of Manchester.

DER SPIEGEL: In November 2001, you came up with the acronym BRIC to describe four economies that stood out for their exceptional growth: Brazil, Russia, India and China. How do you feel about the BRICs today?

O’Neill: It was a nice dream.

DER SPIEGEL: Wasn’t your own forecast convincing?

O’Neill: It’s comical that people really thought that I would make forecasts for the next 50 years – and that I would be right. That’s ridiculous! It actually was the art of the possible. I wanted to show that four countries that had been economically subordinate in the course of the 20th century could become influential in the 21st century and even overtake the large economies. Their enormous growth was real and impressive. From a certain point onwards, they used their potential for further development very differently.

DER SPIEGEL: That sounds more like four individual dreams, not one.

O’Neill: If you like. Today, the four countries are not in the same league. Years ago, I pointed out that I would only talk about IC, i.e., India and China. Brazil and Russia have not been able to move forward and realize their potential. They have turned out to be massive disappointments.

DER SPIEGEL: In China, the gross domestic product has not increased sevenfold since 2000, as you dreamt, but fully eighteenfold. At the same time, your dream for Russia’s GDP – of around 1.7 trillion dollars in 2020 – was almost right on.

O’Neill: The Chinese economy has developed far more than I expected at the time. Russia, on the other hand, left the growth path early. Don’t forget: During the first 10 years, the Russian economy actually grew, since then it has moved backwards.

“Brazil and Russia have not been able to move forward and realize their potential. They have turned out to be massive disappointments.”
DER SPIEGEL: Do you regret that you praised the potential of Russia 20 years ago – potentially leading to a lot of foreign money flowing into the country?

O’Neill: I don’t have anything to regret. I didn’t come up with BRIC to recommend investments. Many may have understood it that way after my observations were widely accepted.

DER SPIEGEL: Would it have been appropriate to warn against Russia at a certain point?

O’Neill: It was the Russian leadership itself that did the job in 2006, when they flattened Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s oil and energy company Yukos before the eyes of the world. Investors understand such things as a warning shot. In retrospect, that was the moment when the Russian BRIC dream started bursting.

DER SPIEGEL: People in Moscow, though, seemed to continue believing in it for quite some time after that.

O’Neill: That is correct, they did take BRIC as a forecast. I remember an invitation to speak at the St. Petersburg Summit in 2008, a kind of Russian World Economic Forum. The expectations of the hosts were not clear to me at first: I was supposed to talk about the stunning growth of the Russian economy and leave no doubt that Russia would be one of the five largest economies in 2020. But I was not prepared to do that; the reality simply did not reflect it. I fired a warning shot right into the heart of the Russian establishment. After my talk, the mood was at rock bottom; we held on to our coffee cups in embarrassment. That day, I realized that Russia was facing huge problems. While Putin’s people were confusing my dream with reality, they weren’t ready to do anything about it. They wanted me to serve as a kind of key witness for a story that was ultimately insubstantial.

DER SPIEGEL: What exactly did you say in St. Petersburg?

O’Neill: That an entire country cannot rely on oil and gas prices rising forever if the economy as a whole is going to grow and be healthy. In the case of Russia, it’s the scale of corruption and the terrible demographics – in particular, the low life expectancy among men. Productivity was and still is a huge issue. On this basis, one might be able to manage 2 percent growth for a few years. But for a stable, long-term development with significantly more growth, profound reforms and reliable and viable institutions are necessary. There’s only one way to boost the economy: by increasing productivity and enabling the establishment of new enterprises as well as attracting foreign investment. In other words, the full monty.

“Gold is an uninteresting, old-fashioned historic obsession of the 1940s. I don’t see any use for it.”
DER SPIEGEL: Was nobody interested in your criticism in Russia?

O’Neill: It was completely unwanted. Most of my contacts, technocrats from the Central Bank or the Finance Ministry, seemed to feel they were on a safe path with Putin. I was often struck by how widely-held the belief was regarding his excellence as a strategist. I never bought into that. The truth is that the international financial crisis of those years benefited Putin because it drove up the price of oil. Hence, he could continue to promise growth and prosperity to the Russian people. It was clear that his huge popularity was bound to decline as soon as the oil price fell, which happened from 2014 onwards.

DER SPIEGEL: And what did the great strategist do then?

O’Neill: He had to change tack when he realized that he couldn’t achieve the growth that had taken place pre-crisis. Nor could he really reform, because much of his personal financial benefit and that of some of the people close to him depended on the status quo. So he began propagating the goal, so to speak, of: “Make Russia Great Again!” Instead of growth, Russians were now getting nationalism. From what we can see, Putin has brought himself economic bankruptcy along with it.

And oil and gas facility belonging to Gazprom in Novoprtovskoye: “An entire country cannot rely on oil and gas prices rising forever if the economy as a whole is going to grow and be healthy.”

DER SPIEGEL: Can Putin avert bankruptcy by forcing the West to pay for gas and oil imports in rubles?

O’Neill: Since treaties will have to be amended, the West would have to allow itself to be forced. I think it is more likely that Russia will export less after this clumsy demand. But you can also see in it a typical move by Putin, whose hand has undoubtedly been forced by Western sanctions. He obviously wants to put the sanctioning parties, who buy energy from him, under pressure themselves, because if they agree to the demand, they would have to buy mass amounts of rubles from the very Central Bank that has been excluded from international business and whose immense dollar reserves have been frozen. The whole debacle reveals how heavily Putin is dependent on international finance as long as the dollar is the largest reserve currency. In the end, it is the West that will decide on Putin’s bankruptcy – and other despots will think twice in the future about where they park their money.

DER SPIEGEL: Can the dollar continue in its current role in light of the huge sovereign debt load of the United States and the continued growth of China?

O’Neill: Nobody knows, but at the moment there is a lot to be said for it, even if there are limits to everything, certainly including America’s mountain of debt. But to end the dollar’s reserve career – these prophecies are decades old, by the way – a new currency like China’s must be ready. That requires reformist steps and an openness not evident in Xi Jinping’s current one-party state. Even if the German doctrine “change through trade” (“Wandel durch Handel”) has not worked. It is no coincidence that only democracies – the U.S., Europe and Japan – provide reserve currencies.

DER SPIEGEL: Putin has stashed a lot of gold at the same time. What use – apart from serving as a war chest – do gold reserves still have today?

O’Neill: Gold is an uninteresting, old-fashioned historic obsession of the 1940s. I don’t see any use for it, except the one you’ve mentioned. Only governments that lack self-confidence stockpile gold. It’s pointless.

DER SPIEGEL: Germany is said to have the second largest gold reserves in the world. What would you do with it?

O’Neill: Do something more imaginative with it! Sell it and invest the money in education or in the fight against disease.

“For Germans, it must be a shock to realize the level of dependency on foreign energy.”

DER SPIEGEL: Or should Berlin, in the light of the transformation announced by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, buy weapons?

O’Neill: That would still be better than having gold.

DER SPIEGEL: What condition do you think the world economy is in today?

O’Neill: Very, very uncertain and complicated. I have not seen greater macroeconomic uncertainty in the past 40 years. Beyond the difficulties created by the corona pandemic, a situation has arisen that can change daily and lead to extreme reactions on the markets at any time – driven sometimes by fear, sometimes by greed. As is well known, these are the two strongest factors of economic action, which in turn can cause or accelerate crises. What would happen if tomorrow the sanctions were eased again by a peace agreement? The greed on the Russian market would probably be almost unstoppable.

DER SPIEGEL: What worries you most from an economic point of view?

O’Neill: That the general expectation of inflation continues to grow. It is the most dangerous condition for actual inflation. Then, the central banks would have to react and increase interest rates to 6 percent or more to force a recession. That would throw us back into a situation like in the 1970s, which was called “stagflation”: Money lost value, wages and prices went up, while the economy didn’t grow.

DER SPIEGEL: How can such a development be prevented?

O’Neill: The current situation is by no means conducive to better productivity. But that is exactly what we should be aiming for – at least at the end of the crisis: to increase the value of work for as many people and companies as possible. One thing is certain: Even before Putin’s war, the general conditions had deteriorated considerably and a decline in economic growth in the second half of 2022 was programmed. However, I have hope that the rest of the world can avert a real shock. For Russia it is a nightmare.

DER SPIEGEL: Is there anything that makes you optimistic at the moment?

O’Neill: First, as Winston Churchill said: “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” I strongly believe great opportunities arise from every crisis, not least financial ones. Secondly, the state we are in now demonstrates the importance of cooperation and collaboration – and that there is no advantage to standing alone, especially as the aggressor. And thirdly, we are learning again that bad things can happen, and that history isn’t always on our side. At the same time, we must continue to adapt to new conditions. For Germans, for example, it must be a shock to realize the level of dependency on foreign energy. The same goes for Germany’s dependency on exports. I think it’s insane that the largest economy in the heart of Europe can only be doing well if the rest of the world is doing well. It would be good if Germany didn’t only wake up with a new military framework as a result of this crisis, but also did everything it could with great people and ideas to turn its dependencies into a new edge.

Source : Spiegel

Aging Slows Down Walking Speed – What You Need to Know and How to Improve Your Walking Speed

What advice do you have about walking as you get older?

Walking speed (gait speed) or mobility is necessary for most tasks that humans undertake. Slowing of walking speed is associated with aging in all persons. Walking speed has also been associated both with how long a person will live (survival) and with changes that occur when older persons are having difficulty or become unable to do tasks. In research studies walking ability has been assessed by tests where persons are either asked to walk at their usual speed (sometimes called self-selected walking speed) OR fast walking speed where a person is instructed to walk as fast as they can safely.

How fast do I need to walk to cross the road safely?

To undertake various activities within the community that involve walking, the average distances required to walk vary from 200-600 metres. The task that usually concerns older persons most in relation to walking speed is how quickly they need to walk in order to cross a road safely. The critical speed cited for this task is 1.14 meters/second and has been broken down in the following way:

  • Crossing a 2 lane road (4 metres/lane) in 10 seconds (5 seconds per lane),
  • And 3 seconds to get up and down off either curb (1.5 seconds per curb).
  • The critical speed is 8 metres/7 seconds = 1.14meters/second.

The speed we are able to walk decreases as we age. There are several reports that indicate some normal ranges for older persons. For example, general walking speeds for community activities are 1.2-1.4 metres/sec until 80 years and 1.0-1.8 metres/second until 90 years and older.

Older persons who have a walking speed of less than 1 metre/second have reported ceasing involvement in any regular physical activity. Self-selected walking speed associated with frailty has been reported as less than 0.65 metres/second if you are short (i.e. = 159cm) and 0.75m/sec if you are taller (height >159cm).

How does my walking speed compare to others of my age?

Below is a Table of usual walking speeds given for women and men by different age groups.

Assessing your own walking speed

You can assess your walking speed using the 10 metre walk test. You need a 20 metre path with 5 metres to get up to normal speed, 10 metres for measurement of your normal walking pace and 5 metres to slow down. You should measure how long it takes you to walk the 10 metre length or get someone else to time your walking speed over this distance. The figure below illustrates how to do this. Then calculate your walking speed by dividing 10 metres by the number of seconds it took you to determine your speed in metres/second.

How does our walking speed change with age?

As we age our walking gets:

  • slower
  • less stable when we walk
  • less efficient
  • the steps we take are less coordinated and
  • the timing is poor

Our posture may not be upright and flexible, and together with decreased vision and hearing, this makes it harder for us to respond to our environment when we are walking. However, these changes need not limit you.

How can you improve your walking speed? Strengthen the body structures!

If we notice that we are getting slower in our walking here are some strategies we can use to maintain an efficient walking speed.

There are TWO approaches to improving your walking speed. The first approach addresses the structural changes we are experiencing in our body as we age. It is important to find ways to improve these structural changes; these body parts are the necessary ‘machinery’ we need to walk. These structural changes include changes in muscle strength in our legs and in our trunk which we need to stabilize ourselves as we walk. We also need our joints to be flexible so the muscles can move our limbs efficiently, for example, in the length of the steps we take when we walk. Changes we might notice in our body structures could include, being unable to extend your leg behind you in order to step forwards, or difficulty standing on your legs for longer periods or difficulty lifting your foot as you swing your leg forwards.

One systematic review and one umbrella review found that exercise interventions can improve walking speed and measures of physical function in frail older adults. Another systematic review of studies in healthy older adults found that resistance training to strengthen the leg muscles was the most effective way to improve gait speed.

Table 1 below provides a summary of exercises that have been shown to improve body structures for walking more efficiently.

Enlarge image . . . . .

How can you improve your walking speed? Practicing walking to improve the patterning in your brain that controls walking?

The second approach to improving your walking speed involves the training of your brain to walk more efficiently.

We can improve our walking by practicing, which restores the brain pattern used to engage the muscles and nerves to better meet the demands made by walking. We also need a basic level of fitness, involving our cardiorespiratory system, to walk efficiently. This means we do not experience breathlessness as we walk and there is efficient delivery of oxygen to the muscles. If walking takes a lot of energy, you will do it less often compared to persons who don’t feel tired when they walk. Improvements in walking occur when our brains, muscles, joints and nerves respond more efficiently to meet the demands of walking. Skilled walkers tend to have an efficient approach to walking and are more likely to walk more and experience less difficulty with moving generally.

Two studies which included mostly older adults who either had mild or moderate problems with walking have evaluated this problem. These studies showed that exercise interventions that focused on walking activities resulted in greater improvements in walking speed compared to those that focused on structural issues such as strengthening and flexibility alone.

Table 2 shows the best way to improve your walking efficiency. Our overall walking patterns also can be improved by practice. Practice will increase our walking skill, taking less energy to walk, and making it easier to make responses to our environment while we walk.

Enlarge image . . . . .

Bottom line about improving your walking speed

Research shows that our walking speed is an important indicator of our health. In this blog we have identified two approaches that research shows can improve your walking speed. We need to strengthen our body structures used in walking. We also need to practice walking while doing different activities, which improves the control the brain has on our walking and makes our walking more efficient. There is scientific evidence that improvements in gait speed over 1 year were associated with improved survival 8 years later.

It is not known whether these exercise regimes to increase walking speed prevent us having problems with moving as we age or increase our life expectancy. You can continue to measure your walking speed from time to time.

Source: McMaster University